Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Riddley's avatar

Thank you. I suspect this is a point that lies at the center of many Church controversies, from the Reformation through to the present day. For many of us there is is a genuine tension between the God who is awful, transcendent and mighty and whom we need to worship corporately through the Church's cultic worship, and the God-made-Man who we are encouraged to be friends with, have a personal relationship with, open our hearts out to and so on, and it is hard to reconcile those two polarities.

Lurking in all of us who attend more traditional liturgies is the sense that the true God of the Bible is the God who sent down fire upon Elijah's altar and gave the Israelites a strictly formalised system of priestly sacrifices with which to please him from afar. We love the separation of the sanctuary from the nave and have a keen sense that a layman who steps over the altar rail might be struck by lightning. But Moses spoke to God face to face, and Our Lord's rising tore the veil of the temple in two, and New Testament is very clear that in Christ the distance has somehow been overcome and we have direct access to God in a way that we didn't have under the Old Covenant, which must change or somehow transfigure the priestly office and the nature of corporate worship even if it doesn't abolish the need for it entirely in the way that the extreme Protestants claim.

There's something of Ezekiel about it all: the dry bones of ritual worship have to be made to live, and perhaps it is that friendship with God that makes them live. I suspect that is how its best proponents see Vatican II: a renewed emphasis upon personal sanctity and prayer that can make the inherited bones of the Faith more fully alive.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?